ABSTRACT
Background: Research on the impact of COVID-19 on different patient populations has been of great value for the optimization of patient care since the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Earlier, we reported the interim analysis of the immediate outcomes in patients (pts) with hematologic (hem) disease and COVID-19. Long-term results of the CHRONOS19 registry are now available. Methods: CHRONOS19 is an observational prospective cohort study among adult pts ((≥18 years) with hem diseases (malignant or non-malignant) and laboratory-confirmed or suspected (based on clinical symptoms and/or CT) COVID-19 in Russia. Data from 15 centers all over the country were collected on a web-based platform in a de-identified manner at 30, 90, and 180 days after COVID-19 was diagnosed. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included COVID-19 complications, rate of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation, outcomes of hem disease in SARS-CoV-2 infected pts, overall survival, and risk factors for disease severity and mortality. Results: As of July 30, 2021, 666 pts were enrolled (females / males [n (%)]: 317 (48%) / 349 (52%);median [range] age: 56 [18-90] years. Disease types (malignant/non-malignant [n (%)]): 618 (93%) / 48 (7%), including AML 115 (17%), MM 113 (17%), NHL 106 (16%), CML / CMPD 92 (14%), ALL 52 (8%), CLL 50 (8%), MDS 25 (4%), HCL 23 (3%), HL 21 (3%), AA 16 (2%), APL 11 (2%), others 42 (6%);among them induction phase / remission / relapse or refractory / NA in 237 (35%) / 231 (35%) / 152 (23%) / 46 (7%) pts. Concomitant conditions were reported in 385 (58%) pts: cardiovascular 254 (66%), diabetes 76 (20%), obesity 57 (15%), pulmonary 41 (11%), chronic renal 44 (11%) or hepatic 33 (9%) disease, other 90 (23%). At a median follow-up of 7,5(1-19) months, 618 pts were evaluable for the primary outcome. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 16% (100 pts died). Death due to COVID-19 complications occurred in 82 pts, 14 pts died due to progression of hem disease. Overall, 217 (33%) pts had severe disease, COVID-19 complications were detected in 458 (70%) pts, the most common were pneumonia in 425 (93%) pts, respiratory failure in 252 (55%) pts, multiple organ failure in 56 (12%) pts, cytokine storm in 52 (11%) pts, ARDS in 47 (10%) pts, and sepsis in 44 (10%) pts. The rate of ICU admission was 23% (145 pts) with high mortality in this group of pts (77%), 111 (17%) pts required mechanical ventilation, among them only 5 (4.5%) pts survived. Treatment of hem disease was changed, interrupted, or discontinued in 395 (60%) pts with a median delay of 4 weeks. At 30 days, the rate of relapse / progression of hem disease was 5% / 8% (24 / 40 of 517 evaluable pts). At the longer follow-up (90 and 180 days), relapse / progression occurred in another 9 / 23 pts. At the data cutoff, the median overall survival was not reached. Antibody detection was performed in 253 pts: 211 (84%) pts had IgG to SARS-CoV-2. In a univariate analysis, older age (> 60 years), myelotoxic agranulocytosis, transfusion dependence, diabetes among comorbidities, ARDS and other complications, except CRS, ICU and mechanical ventilation (Fig. 1) were associated with higher risks of mortality (p<0.05). The final results of the CHRONOS19 study will be presented. Conclusions: Patients with hem disease and COVID-19 have higher mortality than a general population with SARS-CoV-2 infection, predominantly due to COVID-19 complications. The longer-term follow-up did not reveal any concerns in terms of hem disease outcomes. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Vorobyev: Janssen, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, Biocad, Abbvie: Other: Advisory Boards, Speakers Bureau;Astellas, Novartis, AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau. Chelysheva: Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau;Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Data on the effectiveness and safety of new vaccines against COVID-19 in patients (pts) with hematological diseases are just beginning to accumulate. We planned to obtain such information for pts with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) during vaccination. Objective. To evaluate the antibodies formation and adverse events (AEs) after vaccination against COVID-19 in pts with CML Materials and methods. All pts with CML diagnosis who applied to the National Research Center for Hematology (NRCH, Moscow, Russia) for outpatient or remote consultations were suggested to prospectively report the AEs after getting a vaccination against COVID-19 by the most frequently used vector-based vaccine GamCovidVac (Sputnik V). Two vaccine components with the interval of 21 days were given at the vaccination facilities, as prescribed. At least after 3 weeks after the 2 nd injection, pts were advised to perform a blood test for the specific antibodies against spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2. A semi-quantitative test detecting the SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit (RBD) IgG antibodies by enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) kit was used in the clinic. The results were considered positive with the cutoff index >1,1. The use of any other lab tests detecting antibodies to S protein of SARS-CoV-2 was acceptable as well. Results. In total, 66 pts with chronic phase of CML received a vaccination by Sputnik V in the 7 months period (from 18.12.2020 to 20.07.2021). Me age was 54 years (range 29 - 89 years), 34 (52%) were males. Median (Me) CML duration was 8 years (from the moment of diagnostics up to 20 years). Fifty one (77%) pt received TKI therapy and 15 (23%) were off-therapy at the time of vaccination, including 12 (18%) in a treatment-free remission and 3 (4,5%) pts in the process of diagnosis. Deep and major molecular response (MMR) was in 46 (70%) and 7 (11%) pts, respectively. Two (3%) pts had a molecular response MR2, 11 (17%) had no MR2. Eight (12%) pts had a history of COVID-19 manifestation prior to vaccination. Me time for testing for the antibodies was 27 days (range 5-77) after the 2 nd vaccine injection. The tests were done in 44 (67%) of pts and revealed positive by any of the test systems in 42 (95%) pts. ELISA test was used in 30 (45%) pts and was positive in 25 (83%) of 30 pts. Me cutoff index in the positive samples was 7,7 (range 1,1 - 12) and corresponded to the value observed in healthy people after vaccination (medical stuff, data not shown). In all 3 pts with the history COVID 19, the index of positivity was above the Me value (Fig. 1, 2). Other test systems were used in 14 (21%) pts, in all 14 (100%) the antibodies were found. In 3 of 5 patients with the cutoff index<1 the antibodies were detected by using other test systems, but all with a level slightly above the detection threshold. Me age of these 5 pts was 63 years (range 59- 70), Me time of analysis was 49 days (range 23-59) after 2 nd vaccine shot. All these pts were on treatment by tyrosine kinase inhibitors, 3 pts with MMR and deeper, 1 pt with MR2 and 1 pt without MR2. A weak reverse correlation of the antibody levels with the time after vaccination was noted ( r = - 0,39, p = 0,033). A very weak reverse correlation with age was observed ( r = - 0,28, p = 0,127) (Fig. 1, 2). No AEs after the vaccination were observed in 25 (38%) pts while 41 (62%) pts reported the AEs and 7 (10%) pts did not report their reactions. The AEs were as follows: local pain/discomfort in the injection site in 19 (29%) pts, weakness and/or drowsiness in 20 (30%), fever and/or chills in 16 (24%), other reactions in 8 (12%) including headache, heartbeat, lower back pain, pain in limbs, activation of herpes infection. Conclusion: The single center study revealed no unusual or unexpected AEs in CML pts after the vaccination against COVID-19 by Sputnik V vaccine. The proportion of CML pts with specific antibodies after was 95% which is close to the published results of the 3rd phase study. No significant correlation was found with age (r = -0,28, p = 0,127), however, the absence or very low a tibody levels were detected in individual patients aged about 60-70 years. This data raise a question of a necessity for a non-specific protection (masks, respirators, distance etc) and probably considering additional vaccination in some elderly persons. The duration of a humoral response against COVID-19, protective antibody titer and connection with clinical outcomes in CML pts need further evaluation in parallel with a common population. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Chelysheva: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau;Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Petrova: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Gurianova: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Turkina: Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Despite the availability of vaccination against COVID 19 for all population categories since January 2021, it is moving slowly in Russia. Patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) usually lead a normal life with social interactions. In the context of the COVID 19 pandemic, we find it important to identify the factors of adherence to vaccination and clarify the concerns. Objective: To determine the proportion of CML pts willing to consider vaccination against COVID 19, adherence factors and reasons for not vaccinating. Materials and methods. A survey on the attitude to vaccination against COVID 19 was prospectively carried out among all pts with CML consulted at the outpatient department of National Research Center for Hematology (Moscow, Russia) who agreed to participate. The key questions included considerations for and against vaccination, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, lifestyle, comorbidities and history of COVID 19. Results. Within 4 months (from March 15 to July 19, 2021), 172 CML pts completed the questionnaire. CML chronic phase, advanced phase and blast crisis were in 167 (97%), 4 (2%) and 1(1%) respectively. In total, 141 (82%) pts were on therapy with 1 st, 2 nd and >3 rd therapy line in 77 (55%), 33 (23%) and 31 (22%) pts, respectively. Thirty one (18%) had no therapy: 6 (3.5%) newly diagnozed, 25 (14.5%) in a treatment-free remission. A deep and major molecular response was in 77 (45%) and 30 (17%) pts, respectively. Presence and absence of molecular response MR2 was in 20 (12%) and 45 (26%) pts respectively. The median age of pts was 46 years (range 19-82), 75(44%) were males. Married 108 (63%), 70 (41%) lived with elderly relatives, 35 (20%) with children. A higher education was in 123 (72%) pts, 123 (72%) could not work remotely and 46 (27%) had interactions to people by work. Any comorbidity was in 89 (52%) pts, 42(24%) had >1 concomitant disease, 48 (28%) had cardiovascular diseases, 44 (26%) had an obesity. A history of COVID 19 was in 41 (24%) pts and in the close circle of 74 (43%) pts. Vaccination was supported by 94(55%) pts (with 29 (17%) already vaccinated) and not supported by 76 (44%) pts, 2 (1%) pts did not answer. Among those supporting vaccination vs not supporting there was significantly more males (52% vs 33%, p=0,012), married pts (73% vs 49%, p<0,001) and pts with higher education (88% vs 51%, p=0,006). Other factors (age, comorbidities, obesity, profession-related features, COVID 19 in pts or their environment, living with elderly relatives or children, therapy and treatment response) were not significant. Less pts were against vaccination in June-July 2021 before the 3 rd outbreak of COVID 19 compared to spring period (33% vs 50%, p=0,045). The two most common reasons to avoid vaccination were the fear of complications in 37(49%) pts and waiting for additional data in 19(25%) (Fig.1). Notably, 7 (9%) pts considered CML as a contraindication to vaccination. Among those supporting vaccination, 55(59%) preferred to choose the GamCovidVac (Sputnik V) vaccine, 20(21%) had no preference (Fig.2). Out of 32 pts who gave the rationale for the Sputnik V choice 19(59%) noted its best availability, study or popularity (Fig.3). Among 23 pts with additional questions 12 (52%) wondered about the possibility of vaccination with CML diagnosis and 6 (26%) asked help with a vaccine choice. Conclusion: Despite access to vaccines against COVID 19 with proven efficacy and safety, almost half of CML pts (44%) do not support vaccination. Socio-demographic factors such as gender, education, marriage status appeared to be significant for this decision. Considering the frequent concerns of the possibility of vaccination with CML diagnosis as well as the fear of complications, hematologists should provide a relevant clarifying information on these issues. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Chelysheva: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau;Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Petrova: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Gurianova: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Kokhno: Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Turkina: Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.
ABSTRACT
The results of long-term follow-up of patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) do not lose their importance. Data from routine clinical practice are of particular interest. The use of 1 st (imatinib, IM) and 2nd generation TKI (2G TKI) led to a significant increase in survival, so the probability of death associated with CML could be significantly lower than the probability of death due to common causes of death other than CML. To analyze the overall survival (OS) and causes of mortality in CML pts treated in routine clinical practice in Russian Federation for a long period (>15 years) of time. The long-term follow-up data of the Russian part of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) OSP EUTOS multicenter observational study were evaluated. The analyzed cohort consisted of 678 Ph/BCR-ABL-positive CML pts from 35 regions of Russia diagnosed in 2002-2006 with IM therapy initiation ≤6 months (mo) after diagnosis. Median (Me) age was 47(range 18-81) years (y), 47% males. Chronic phase, accelerated phase and blast crisis at diagnosis was in 631 (93%), 41(6%) and 6(1%) pts, respectively. The annual number of newly diagnosed pts was as follows: 2002 - 15 pts, 2003 - 38 pts, 2004 - 46 pts, 2005 - 206 pts, 2006 - 302 pts. The last update for 209 pts was done in Jun. 2021;last contact for 100 pts - in 2020, for 39pts - in 2019, for the other - before 2018. The date of the last contact/death could not be established for 14 pts. Statistical analysis included 661 pts, the OS was evaluated by Kaplan-Mayer method using the SAS 9.4 package. In total, 331 (50%) pts of the analyzed cohort were alive with the Me follow-up of 180 (range 2-232) mo or 15 y (range 2 mo-19,3 y). All pts started therapy with IM with 25% switched to 2G TKI in subsequent therapy lines. In total, 218 (66%) pts achieved MR4, 183 (55%) pts got MMR;46 (21%) of these pts with deep molecular response (DMR) were observed in hematology centers of Moscow. The 15-y OS in the total cohort was 63% (CI 59-70%)(fig.1). The OS by age groups was as follows: 18-40yy-75% (CI 73-82%), 40-60yy- 63% (CI 59-70%), 60-80yy- 37% (CI 30-45%). The most complete information was provided by Moscow centers (2 centers, 113 pts). The 15-y OS of pts receiving treatment in Moscow was significantly higher vs pts from other regions (32 centers, 548 pts): 75% vs 60%, p=0,0030 (fig.2). The mortality in the whole cohort of 661 pts was 35% (233 pts). Of these 233 pts, 112(48%) pts deaths were due to CML progression to AP or BP (including non-compliant cases);3pts (1,5%) died after allogenic stem cell transplantation (infection complications);the cause of death was unknown in 50 (21,5%) pts. The highest death rate from CML progression was at 4-9 y of follow-up. Deaths caused by concomitant diseases were in 68 (29%) pts: coronary artery disease/myocardial infarction/heart failure in 42 (62%) of 68 pts, acute ischemic stroke in 10 (15%) pts, second malignancies (Cr- cancer) in 10 (15%) pts (lung tumor, metastatic esophageal Cr, stomach Cr, brain tumor, sigmoid colon Cr, rectal colon Cr, melanoma, renal Cr, breast tumor, other hematological malignancies), accidents - 1 pt, liver cirrhosis - 2 pts, in 2 cases - respiratory virus infections complicated with pneumonia, 1 pt died due to Covid-19. Conclusions. The long-term follow-up of the multicenter study EUTOS OSP in 35 regions of Russian Federation allows not only to characterize the 15-y OS in CML pts but also provides the long-term outlook of the routine clinical practice. Probably, better OS of CML patients receiving treatment in Moscow (2 centers) may be related to organizational issues of interaction with the federal center, better monitoring and timely switching to 2G TKI therapy. The organization and support of multicenter studies may improve the situation with the treatment of diseases of the blood system. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Chelysheva: Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Vinogradova: Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau;Novartis Phar a: Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Lomaia: Novartis: Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria;BMS: Honoraria;Pharmstandard: Honoraria. Voloshin: Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Consultancy;Biacad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Turkina: Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau;Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau.
ABSTRACT
Background: Since SARS-CoV-2 infection heavily affects vulnerable populations including those with immune suppression, it is of special value to study clinical course, treatment outcomes, and immunity in patients (pts) with hematological (hem) malignancies. Methods: CHRONOS19 is an ongoing observational study in adult pts (≥18 years) with hem diseases (malignant or non-malignant) and COVID-19 in Russia. This web-based registry collected de-identified data from 15 centers all over the country at 30, 90, and 180 days after lab-confirmed or suspected (based on CT and/or clinical symptoms) COVID-19 diagnosis. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Results: As of data cut-off on April 14, 2021, 626 pts were enrolled in the study;562 were eligible for primary endpoint assessment, n (%): M/F 271 (48%) / 291 (52%), median age 56 [18-90] years, malignant disease in 516 (92%) pts, among them induction phase / relapse or refractory / remission / NA in 180 (35%) / 120 (23%) / 187 (36%) / 29 (6%) pts. Thirty-day all-cause mortality in pts with hem malignancies was 19%;83% of deaths were due to COVID-19 complications. No increase of hem disease relapse rate after COVID-19 was observed at Day 90 or Day 180, although 180-day data was still not mature at the time of analysis. IgG to SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 84% of pts with hem malignancies (167/199). The highest rate of detected antibody immunity was found in pts with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (100%;13/13), HL (100%;12/12), and multiple myeloma (97%;34/35), the lowest – in pts with CLL (62%;8/13) and NHL (60%;6/10 and 56%;10/18 for low-grade and high-grade lymphoma, respectively). igG detection rate in CD20+ lymphoma (60%) was significantly lower than in HL or T-cell lymphoma (p=0.004). Pts with ECOG 0-2 throughout the disease had a high rate of antibody immunity (90%;104/116) vs. those with ECOG 3-4 at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis (77.5%;31/40) or with worsening of ECOG to 3-4 during the disease (78%;36/46). Five cases of SARS-CoV-2 re-infection were described. Conclusions: Pts with hem malignancies and COVID-19 have higher mortality than the general population. Low post-disease antibody immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and cases of re-infection may justify vaccination of these pts and warrant further research. Clinical trial identification: NCT04422470. Legal entity responsible for the study: National Research Center for Hematology. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.